Within a timing-it-right framework and based on the analysis of the changes in patient needs, a timeliness requirement questionnaire was compiled. Methods: The article pool was formed according to the relevant literature, qualitative interview results, and timeliness framework. Through two rounds of expert content validity evaluation and the invitation of 10 stroke patients to read over the scale, the articles were expanded and revised to form the initial version of the rating scale. A total of 200 new hospital patients were investigated by random sampling, and 183 effective questionnaires were used for clinical survey and recovery. Through project analysis and reliability and validity tests, the clinical version of the scale was formed. Results: Through qualitative interviews and literature enquiries, combined with the timeliness framework, 73 alternative pools were formed. The initial version of 36 articles was formed by pretests and two rounds of expert content validity evaluation. Item selection and exploratory factor analysis did not reduce the number of articles. The results of reliability analysis showed that the total Cronbach’s α of the scale was 0.795, and the value of each dimension was above 0.7. The half reliability was evaluated by Guttman Split-Half coefficient; the total half reliability of the scale was 0.782, and the value of each dimension was above 0.7. The reliability and validity met the psychometric standards, and the clinical application version of the rating scale was established. Conclusion: The stroke patient timeliness requirement questionnaire has good reliability and validity.