Abstract
To compare the efficacy and safety of bridging therapy (intravenous thrombolysis plus
endovascular treatment) versus direct endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients with acute posterior circulation
large vessel occlusion (PC-LVO). Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study. A total of 110
eligible patients with PC-LVO were enrolled, comprising 66 in the bridging group (receiving intravenous rt-PA
within 4.5 hours of onset followed by EVT) and 44 in the direct EVT group [with onset-to-puncture time (OPT)
extendable up to 24 hours). Clinical data were collected and compared between the two groups, including
baseline characteristics such as age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, history of atrial fibrillation, admission National
Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, anesthesia method, OPT, and time window stratification. The
primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-3 at 90
days (good outcome). Safety indicators included the incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH)
and 90-day mortality. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association
between bridging therapy and good outcome (mRS≤3), adjusting for baseline differences and time factors.
Results: There were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups
except for OPT (P>0.05); the bridging group had a shorter OPT [200 (150, 240) min vs 480 (320, 720) min, P<
0.001]. The 90-day good outcome rate was 53.0% (35/66) in the bridging group and 40.9% (18/44) in the direct
group, with no statistically significant difference (P=0.16). The incidence of sICH in the bridging group was
slightly higher than that in the direct group (9.1% vs 4.5% , P=0.38). The 90-day mortality was 25.8% in the
bridging group and 18.2% in the direct group (P=0.34). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed no
significant association between bridging therapy and a good 90-day outcome (P=0.30). A high NIHSS score was
an independent risk factor for poor outcome (P<0.01), while older age showed only a trend toward adverse prognosis (P=0.20). Prolonged
OPT was significantly associated with poor outcome (per 1-hour delay, OR≈0.61, P= 0.04). The results of the sensitivity analysis
(considering only patients with OPT≤6 hours) were consistent with the main analysis. Conclusion: In this retrospective cohort, there
were no statistically significant differences in functional outcome and mortality between the bridging therapy group and the direct EVT
group in patients with PC-LVO. Future large-sample randomized studies are needed to further validate the role of bridging therapy in
posterior circulation stroke.
Key words
posterior circulation stroke; large vessel occlusion; bridging therapy; endovascular treatment; efficacy; safety
Cite this article
Download Citations
CHEN Tonghe1,2
,LIU Yaxin1,2
,ZHI Wenhong1,2
,LIU Zhiguang1,2.
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Bridging Therapy and Direct EndovascularTreatment in Acute Posterior Circulation Large-Vessel Occlusion[J]. Neural Injury and Functional Reconstruction. 2026, 21(8): 441-444 https://doi.org/10.16780/j.cnki.sjssgncj.20260001
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}