Abstract
To investigate whether general anesthesia exposure during infancy (0~2 years old)
affects attention in school-aged children. Methods: School-aged children who underwent general anesthesia
during infancy (0~2 years old) between June 2009 and December 2013 at Nanjing Children's Hospital and were
currently in primary school were selected as the exposed group (n=203). Healthy school-aged children without
general anesthesia exposure were matched as the control group (n=208). The children underwent standardized
attention tests and parent questionnaires. The exposed group was further subdivided into different subgroups
based on the age of first exposure, duration of exposure, and number of exposures. The primary assessment tools
were the Integrated Visual and Auditory Continuous Performance Test (IVA-CPT) and the Chinese version of Sw
anson Nolan and Pelham, Version Scale-parent form(SNAP- Ⅳ)rating scale. Results: Auditory attention
quotient was significantly correlated with gestational age at birth, singleton birth, number of exposures, age at
first exposure, and duration of first anesthesia. Attention deficit and visual persistence quotient were
significantly correlated with gestational age at birth, number of exposures, age at first exposure, and duration of
first anesthesia. Visual sensory/motor quotient was significantly correlated with singleton birth, number of
exposures, age at first exposure, and duration of first anesthesia. Auditory attention quotient was also
significantly correlated with gestational age at birth, singleton birth, number of exposures, age at first exposure,
and duration of first anesthesia. Conclusion: General anesthesia exposure during infancy (0~2 years old) has a
certain impact on the development of attention in school-aged children, with multiple exposures being a
prominent factor.
Key words
general anesthesia exposure
Cite this article
Download Citations
Analysis of the Impact of Early Infancy General Anesthesia Exposure on Attention in
School-aged Children[J]. Neural Injury and Functional Reconstruction. 2025, 20(5): 249-255
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}