Abstract
To observe the clinical efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
combined with dexzopiclone tablets in the treatment of sleep disorders after cerebral infarction. Methods: Total
90 patients with sleep disorder after cerebral infarction were randomly divided into groups control and
observation with 45 cases in each group. Both groups were treated with routine drug therapy, rehabilitation
therapy, and dexzopiclone tablets, and the observation group was additionally treated with rTMS. Patients in both
groups were assessed by PSQI and SRSS before treatment and 3 weeks after treatment, and polysomnography
was performed and sleep parameters recorded to evaluate the efficacy at the end of treatment. The recurrence of
sleep disorders 1 month after the end of treatment was followed up. Results: There was no significant difference
in general condition, PSQI and SRSS score, and sleep parameters between the two groups before treatment (P> 0.05). Comparing data before treatment and after 3 weeks of treatment, PSQI and SRSS score, sleep latency,
sleep time, sleep efficiency, wake-up frequency, wake-up time, S1% , S2% , S3-S4% , and REM% of the two
groups showed a significant difference (P<0.01). There was a significant difference in the PSQI and SRSS score
and sleep parameters between the observation group and control group (P<0.05), and the effective rate in the
observation group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). One month after the end of treatment, the
recurrence rate in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: rTMS
combined with dexzopiclone tablets is more effective than dexzopiclone tablets alone in the treatment of sleep
disorders after cerebral infarction.
Key words
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Cite this article
Download Citations
Clinical Study of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Dexzopiclone
Tablets in Treatment of Sleep Disorder in Cerebral Infarction Patients[J]. Neural Injury and Functional Reconstruction. 2020, 15(5): 267-270
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}