THRIVE量表、mSOAR量表和简易量表对急性缺血性卒中患者1年预后预测价值

高金颖;胡明昕;马瑞

神经损伤与功能重建 ›› 2020, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5) : 256-258.

PDF(903 KB)
中国科技核心期刊
美国《化学文摘》CAS数据库收录
日本科学技术振兴机构数据库收录
湖北省优秀期刊
中国知网网络首发期刊
PDF(903 KB)
神经损伤与功能重建 ›› 2020, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5) : 256-258.
论著

THRIVE量表、mSOAR量表和简易量表对急性缺血性卒中患者1年预后预测价值

  • 高金颖,胡明昕,马瑞
作者信息 +

THRIVE Scale, mSOAR Scale and Simple Scale Scores for 1-year Prognosis of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的:探讨THRIVE量表、mSOAR量表和简易量表对急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者1年不良预后的预测 价值。方法:纳入AIS患者772例,收集患者临床基线资料,同时应用THRIVE量表、mSOAR量表和简易量表 进行评分。随访1年,以患者1年时出现死亡或改良Rankin评分(mRS)≥3分为不良预后,应用ROC曲线下 面积(AUC)比较3个量表对患者预后的预测价值。结果:本组772例患者根据随访结果,纳入预后良好组576 例(74.6%),不良预后组196例(25.4%),其中死亡68例(34.7%)。THRIVE、mSOAR和简易量表预测患者1年 不良预后的AUC值分别为0.777[95%CI, (0.738, 0.815)]、0.820[95%CI, (0.706, 0.770)]和0.854[95%CI, (0.827, 0.878)](均P<0.001);THRIVE和mSOAR量表的AUC值均低于简易量表(P<0.05)。THRIVE、mSOAR和简 易量表预测死亡结局的 AUC 值分别为 0.775[95%CI, (0.721, 0.828)]、0.748[95%CI, (0.716, 0.778)]和 0.807 [95%CI, (0.778, 0.835)](均 P<0.05);且 mSOAR 量表的 AUC 值低于简易量表(P<0.05)。结论:THRIVE、 mSOAR和简易量表对AIS患者1年不良预后有较好的预测效能;简易量表的预测能力更优。

Abstract

To explore the predictive value of the THRIVE Scale, mSOAR Scale and Simple Scale sores for 1-year adverse prognosis of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Methods: A total of 772 patients with AIS were enrolled. The clinical baseline data were collected and compared. All the patients were scored with THRIVE Scale, mSOAR Scale and Simple Scale, and were followed up for 1 year. Death or Modified Rankin score (mRS) ≥3 points at 1-year were regarded as a poor prognosis. The AUC value of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to compare the predictive values of the three scales. Results: According to the follow-up results, 576 cases (74.6% ) were included in good prognosis group and 196 cases (25.4% ) were included in poor prognosis group, of which 68 cases (34.7% ) died. The AUC values of THRIVE, mSOAR and Simple Scale for 1-year predictive adverse prognosis of AIS patients were 0.777 [95% CI, (0.738, 0.815)], 0.820 [95% CI, (0.706, 0.770)] and 0.854 [95% CI, (0.827, 0.878)] (all P<0.001). And the AUC values of the THRIVE and mSOAR scales were lower than that of Simple Scale (P<0.05). The AUC values of THRIVE, mSOAR and Simple Scale for death were 0.775 [95% CI, (0.721, 0.828)], 0.748 [95% CI, (0.716, 0.778)] and 0.807 [95% CI, (0.778, 0.835)] (all P<0.05). And the AUC value of mSOAR scale was lower than that of Simple Scale (P<0.05). Conclusion: THRIVE, mSOAR and Simple Scale have good predictive power for 1-year poor prognosis of AIS patients and the Simple Scale has a better predictive ability.

关键词

THRIVE量表 / mSOAR量表 / 简易量表 / 急性脑梗死 / 预后

Key words

THRIVE Scale

引用本文

导出引用
高金颖;胡明昕;马瑞. THRIVE量表、mSOAR量表和简易量表对急性缺血性卒中患者1年预后预测价值[J]. 神经损伤与功能重建. 2020, 15(5): 256-258
THRIVE Scale, mSOAR Scale and Simple Scale Scores for 1-year Prognosis of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke[J]. Neural Injury and Functional Reconstruction. 2020, 15(5): 256-258

PDF(903 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/