探究青少年抑郁障碍患者的童年创伤、父母教养方式及家庭功能

刘丽芳;全军;李水英;张倬秋

神经损伤与功能重建 ›› 2019, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (9) : 444-446.

PDF(438 KB)
中国科技核心期刊
美国《化学文摘》CAS数据库收录
日本科学技术振兴机构数据库收录
湖北省优秀期刊
中国知网网络首发期刊
PDF(438 KB)
神经损伤与功能重建 ›› 2019, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (9) : 444-446.
论著

探究青少年抑郁障碍患者的童年创伤、父母教养方式及家庭功能

  • 刘丽芳,全军,李水英,张倬秋
作者信息 +

The Childhood Trauma, Parenting Style and Family Function in Adolescents with Depression

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的:探究青少年抑郁障碍患者的童年创伤、父母教养方式及家庭功能。方法:选择青少年抑郁障碍 患者96例为研究组,另选择年龄、性别与研究组相匹配的健康青少年96例为对照组。采用儿童期创伤问卷 简化版(CTQ-SF)、父母教养方式评价量表(EMBU)、家庭功能评定量表(FAD)对2组进行问卷评估。结果: 研究组的情感虐待(t=4.6154,P=0.0000)、情感忽视(t=4.0670,P=0.0001)因子评分及CTQ-SF总分(t=5.2431, P=0.0000)明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组母亲情感温暖与理解关心(t=-2.1265,P=0.0348)、父亲情感 温暖与理解关心(t=-3.0984,P=0.0022)评分低于对照组(P<0.05),研究组母亲拒绝否认(t=2.7257,P= 0.0070)、母亲惩罚严厉(t=2.7204,P=0.0071)、父亲惩罚严厉(t=3.2322,P=0.0014)和父亲拒绝与否认(t= 3.7895,P=0.0002)评分高于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组的问题解决(t=3.0227,P=0.0029)、沟通(t=3.0006,P= 0.0031)、角色(t=3.3780,P=0.0009)、情感反应(t=3.9031,P=0.0001)、情感介入(t=4.8471,P=0.0000)、行为控 制(t=3.6788,P=0.0003)及总的功能(t=5.7201,P=0.0000)的因子评分高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:青少年抑 郁障碍患者存在更多的童年创伤,父母教养方式及家庭功能都存在一定问题。

Abstract

To explore childhood trauma, parenting styles, and family functions in adolescents with depression. Methods: A total of 96 adolescents with depressive disorder were enrolled as the study group, another 96 healthy adolescents matched with the age and gender were enrolled as the control group. The two groups were assessed by the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form(CTQ-SF), the Egma Minnen Bardndoms uppforstran (EMBU), the Family assessment device(FAD). Results: The scores of the emotional abuse factor (t=4.6154, P=0.0000), emotional neglect factor (t=4.0670, P=0.0001)and total scores of CTQ-SF (t= 5.2431, P=0.0000) in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group. The score of mother's emotional warmth and understanding care (t=- 2.1265, P=0.0348), father's emotional warmth and understanding care (t=-3.0984, P=0.0022) in the study group were lower than those in the control group. The score of mother refused and denied (t=2.7257, P=0.0070), the mother punishes severely (t=2.7204, P=0.0071), the father punishes severely (t=3.2322, P=0.0014), and the father refuses and denies (t=3.7895, P=0.0002) in the study group were higher than those in the control group. The factor scores of problem solving (t=3.0227, P= 0.0029), communication (t=3.0006, P=0.0031), roles (t=3.3780, P=0.0009), affective responsiveness (t=3.9031, P=0.0001), affective involvement (t=4.8471, P=0.0000), behavior control (t=3.6788, P=0.0003) and general functioning (t=5.7201, P=0.0000) in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group. Conclusion: The Adolescent patients with depressive disorder have more childhood trauma. Their parental rearing style and family function have certain problems.

关键词

青少年 / 抑郁障碍 / 童年创伤 / 父母教养方式 / 家庭功能

Key words

adolescents

引用本文

导出引用
刘丽芳;全军;李水英;张倬秋. 探究青少年抑郁障碍患者的童年创伤、父母教养方式及家庭功能[J]. 神经损伤与功能重建. 2019, 14(9): 444-446
The Childhood Trauma, Parenting Style and Family Function in Adolescents with Depression[J]. Neural Injury and Functional Reconstruction. 2019, 14(9): 444-446

PDF(438 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/